nomadshiba⚡⚡

its me, you know
intp

bip352 / silent payments: sp1qqf95gnrh453sncve4yal29zedxll3k48a0kcxhted66nnu5frcshwqmduw4x6a9ggvcmesah9qu32jx95ust635ng6xrd570mpu9hhmn7cpwpee5

My Apps:
- https://npub.name
- https://persona.nstr.app
- https://zapme.coffee
- https://xbt.nomadshiba.me

Soon:
- https://bitcoinatlas.app
- https://nstr.app

Public Key

npub1gkp4cdh5rktehjqjnqc09awey4302dpadlka6mes4fu5spes7fhqfsppqk

NIP-05 Address

me@nomadshiba.me

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsytq6uxm6pm9umeqffsv8j7hvj2ch4xs7klmwaduc2572gquc0ymspr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqguwaehxw309ahx7um5wgknqvfw09skk6tgdahxuefwvdhk6qg0waehxw309ahx7um5wghx6mmdq9phwue69uhhgdmxw5mhv6t9vyerwmn4wehn2cttd3c8jmrtwemrwv3nd5mrw7nwdemk57rsdfkkxurew3cxxurvxeh8j6pjva5kgtn0de5k7msapq2zz

Publishing to

nostr.bitcoiner.social

relay.primal.net

nos.lol

nostr-01.yakihonne.com

nostr.mom

t7fu7viea27nuvo5aklpylkvv723m67znnwjxpjmcpytpcpl6nyh2gid.onion

Author Public Key

npub1gkp4cdh5rktehjqjnqc09awey4302dpadlka6mes4fu5spes7fhqfsppqk

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-09-15 18:52:50 UTC

- reply

inner is pools, outer is miners
in some cases if a pool is using different coinbase tags, outer can also include them.

2026-09-15 16:37:01 UTC

- reply

@npub1x9q…csg7 should be fixed now, polyfill was loading late.

2026-09-15 15:42:30 UTC

- reply

ok asked a friend to try it on safari as well
seems like there is an issue.
gonna try to fix it, weird

2026-09-15 15:35:10 UTC

- reply

thought about it too
gonna add soon

2026-09-15 15:34:12 UTC

- reply

weird works for me on brave
can you press F12 and send me the "console"

2026-09-15 15:07:27 UTC

- reply

fixed it anyway, now ratum matches as omegapool correctly

2026-09-15 13:56:47 UTC

- reply

what browser you have?
what does it say?

2026-09-15 13:20:38 UTC

also added a pool viewer
https://blossom.primal.net/12fc058540e04d2f784f997d8aaab73905addc5e0f9af1a18a44e09db06ddd92.png
https://xbt.nomadshiba.me
i think "nodeStratum" is RATUM but their coinbase tag is not set correctly? idk mempool shows it has RATUM. so idk.
what i did mostly is based on coinbase tag parsing not pool matching. tho i have some of that as well. but "nodeStratum" is way to general to match. so not doing anything about it. pool should fix it.
also if you have a hostname/host in your coinbase tag i also use it to get name and icon from your pwa, manifest.json, or title/favicon etc...
and we parse pool, and miner from the coinbase tag as well based on known formats.

2026-09-15 09:12:11 UTC

nice background podcast
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiHC_7aoEJ4

2026-09-15 09:11:47 UTC

it happened
#nevent1q…vhk4

2026-09-13 22:04:28 UTC

- reply

kinda, if you are using datum with your own gateway. and your datum gateway is overwriting the payout address, so you can use any username. the place you rent the hashrate from can't know your btc address. which increases your privacy. but issue is someone can still track public datum pool data and match your rented hashrate with the hashrates of users on the pool.
similar to some exchanges, some places you rent hashrate from also don't have kyc. but most important place is where you deposit your fiat. if that can be linked to you, then they can follow you. a site nlt having kyc doesn't mean they don't share information with the states.
cleanest way is having a rig, and mining from there. unless they can also somehow link it to you by your electricity usage to your hashrate.

2026-09-13 21:57:22 UTC

- reply

all-in-one has advantages,
especially with data structures.
when you have different software trying to work with eachother and do extra stuff, they take up more disk space for example. because they can't trust eachother. can't benefit from having a monolithic storage and indexing. especially data pointers such as blockhash, txid, pubkeys, all repeat because they can't have some internal pointer or layout.

2026-09-13 15:28:12 UTC

- reply

that's a cli tool.
not an app for clients.

2026-09-13 15:15:51 UTC

rn buying XBT is cheaper than mining it. i expect it won't be for long, price might pass the mining cost soon.
idk, just saying, im keep mining anyway.

2026-09-12 13:27:57 UTC

never enough XBT

2026-09-11 21:23:51 UTC

cost of mining going close to the market price.

2026-09-11 18:58:25 UTC

- reply

also its called Reduced Data Temporary Softfork. not Spam Stopping Softfork.
its job is to reduce data fields.

2026-09-11 18:50:04 UTC

im so funny

2026-09-11 18:24:22 UTC

- reply

opreturn is the worse place.
and also core has taproot exploit.
and core is hardforked

2026-09-11 18:22:33 UTC

- reply

selective pruning makes you a bad relay. full nodes are the only real nodes.
putting data on the chain rarely is not an issue having big parasite protocols for storing data and gamifying is the issue.
letting them grow on the chain is the issue, narrowing rules never requires a hard fork.
core devs gets millions of funding its their job to be a cat.
if you close enough holes you make their job harder and harder, you change the rules under them, so they never grow, they can't, protocol doesn't like them, it breaks them constantly. they have to find bunch of weird tricks to put the data, make it more and more expensive, more and more complex, so its not worth it anymore.
best place to put spam is another chain, second best place is deep inside bitcoin hidden, worse place is out in the open in opreturn.

2026-09-11 18:14:19 UTC

- reply

you can't stop people from organizing

2026-09-11 18:13:35 UTC

- reply

its 4MB rn.
also 1MB limit was added later.
lowering it is a softfork, don't add anything new.

2026-09-11 17:14:59 UTC

bitcoin core/knots is so bad as a software, people are using third-party software to make it usable.

2026-09-11 16:57:32 UTC

- reply

i didn't like the way core worked, they make change, then say ACK NACK etc... feels like politics then a software project.
politics prevents fights, makes people vote, makes them feel like they have power. core is a software we should have had multiple software.
i think chain history is also important, on our side going against miners as node runners is expected, so after a URSF our chain would succeed because we have a history of miner chain being irrelevant/invalid at the end.
and knots is luke's software, nobody points a gun into your head to run it or a specific version of it. bitcoin purity exists that forked after bip110, there's also another fork of knots, that still works on older chain.
and that's the way i like it, a clear captain steering his ship/software someone who is directly responsible for your software.
if you have a better client and get a bigger user base then do it.
core also has centralized power of an organization and few big heads. all software, domain etc does.
at least luke listens to his users, and asks them questions.

2026-09-11 16:46:06 UTC

- reply

its a softfork, it needs nobody's approval. that's the issue. if two big miners antpool and foundry decides its ok its done.

2026-09-11 16:39:26 UTC

again i should read things before pressing on send.
lots of typos

2026-09-11 16:35:47 UTC

- reply

well also i was kinda didnt understand bitcoin fundamentally as a culture before matthew.
changed my view of bitcoin in that way. same for mechanic.
like ok 21M is good, but how do we enforce it? decentralization
what makes bitcoin decentralized, people not trusting someone, but only trusting their own node.
so running your own node is import, verifying, how can we maximize it? because it seems like bitcoin without that and mining pool cartel is nothing but CBDC with extra steps. they can enforce any softfork they want including tail emission via utxo age tax.
etc. i used to think "i dont have to run a node, others are running it." etc.
i think most important question is how do you stop an unwanted MASF?
because you cant. on the suitcoin chain. history says hashrate decides it.
etc.
so i think XBT experiment worth it.

2026-09-11 16:29:15 UTC

- reply

i like XBT, it has 300KB blocks, fixes many things. and it has 300KB finally!
i also work on making my own bitcoin node that has storage optimization+compression and actually looks like a user friendly bitcoin app. its just a hobby thing, and experiment for me.
but im gonna make sure it supports and works on both chains.
i can play both sides, but i like the XBT side better. better people. better software. feels home.
i didnt sell my BTC, but mining XBT. etc..
but im not gonna promote BTC instead of XBT to a bitcoiner.
im not gonna promote fiat instead of BTC to a normie.
if XBT experiment starts to get good results, then i can also recommend it to normies.

2026-09-11 16:17:02 UTC

great points
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxLzNvCf-Qw

2026-09-11 16:10:56 UTC

- reply

i like him because he says what i wanna say to a bigger audience.
can you also answer my other questions

2026-09-11 15:57:00 UTC

make node running normie friendly.

2026-09-11 15:52:09 UTC

you cant witness something this beautiful on suitcoin
https://blossom.primal.net/8abf61991a13ec1b0a9f58cca03debe95c4055b72ae3ad15d29c8d4f5aa5120a.png
https://blossom.primal.net/00e9a554c3d69e117836243c67c3f430b7b28246bc1a657981c85c6c5341bc03.png

2026-09-11 15:41:30 UTC

we should have had 300KB blocks 10 years ago

2026-09-11 15:36:17 UTC

- reply

oh wow didn't notice bip110's purpose was removing spam.
i thought it was being called RDTS

2026-09-11 15:34:43 UTC

yay
https://blossom.primal.net/7ce2cd42c12d006241369d140b9f9aebcb8b07e4e70cb828e96b6e7254bbc5d1.png

2026-09-11 15:25:48 UTC

- reply

OCEAN is backdoored now

2026-09-11 15:23:49 UTC

100% btw health
https://mempool.guide/mining/pool/nomadshiba

2026-09-11 15:21:08 UTC

- reply

it blocked opreturn size, and fixed taproot exploit that was left open knowingly on purpose during development. because they are sneaky like that.
and hardfork we did afterwards finally gave use 300kb blocks

2026-09-11 15:19:08 UTC

- reply

"bitcoin is not democracy" "consensus is 95% of users agreeing".
consensus is common ruleset between node runners.
let say you are not enforcing segwit rules, but you still have consensus between other users who does support it, because its a common ruleset. so miners mine the common ruleset between users.
what is your plan to stop a MASF where it enabled tail emission via utxo age tax? since you follow what the hashrate says.

2026-09-11 15:12:38 UTC

- reply

what does your hardfork solved by removing bip110 rules? and leaving the chain without hashrate?

2026-09-11 15:11:35 UTC

- reply

we had consensus.
and yes they are epstein associate.

2026-09-11 15:10:21 UTC

- reply

what is bad about bip110?

2026-09-11 15:09:30 UTC

- reply

both chain has miner centralization rn.
we have a history of firing the miners from bitcoin

2026-09-11 15:08:36 UTC

- reply

"normie" lol

2026-09-11 15:07:39 UTC

- reply

node count doesn't matter, your node matters. and node count is a useful metric, sometimes.
rn you are showing that you have been listening to mechanic, luke, and matt from third persons, not directly.

2026-09-11 15:06:07 UTC

- reply

im defending bitcoin, and people who actually does the job.
i dont defend luke or matt because they are luke and matt, i can have disagreements. but if they are doing things i already stand by of course im gonna cherish them
300kb blocks, smaller op_returns, taproot exploit patches, block withholding fix, supporting a chain with the history of miners not bullying node runners. yes please

2026-09-11 15:02:03 UTC

- reply

nobody forces anyone to run a software. there is no the bitcoin. everyone runs their own instance of bitcoin, there is no the mempool, or the chain, consensus is common ruleset between the node runners.
bitcoin is not democracy, its decentralized, you run the software. you run the all of bitcoin.
one project can work and decide what ever it wants, people running it decide. and this is a pretty simple softfork to change lock time from 100 block to a month. trying to solve mining centralization.

2026-09-11 14:53:50 UTC

- reply

people use apple and google and nostr and bitcoin and have servers.
he used to be a trader, not a bitcoiner.

2026-09-11 14:51:34 UTC

- reply

i slayed the "heros", it seems like you just followed them

2026-09-11 14:50:50 UTC

- reply

if you are talking about mining centralization, you have no right to flex, suitcoin had centralized mining for years.
more important point is bitcoin decentralization itself, everyone running their own node, validating blocks, deciding mining rules.
bitcoin now has 300KB block size, which reduces block growth. it has history of nodes being in control and not following what the foundry and antpool with its friends. invalid blocks are invalid.
suitcoin has big blocks, history of being a cuck to the mining cartel, and running a node is getting harder everyday.
mean while bitcoin is building good bitcoin apps that prioritizes decentralization.
meaning it cares about keep the global ledger small and easy to run, so everyone can have their own instance of the chain, and can very the txs and blocks for themselves.

2026-09-11 14:44:10 UTC

- reply

are you mining?
once in a life time opportunity

2026-09-11 14:37:17 UTC

- reply

what makes you think he is an idiot?
what do you think about Andy Back? Peter Todd? Jameson Lopp? Michael Saylor? 60% of txs are parasite protocols

2026-09-11 14:34:01 UTC

- reply

do you know difference between centralized and decentralized?
or have you been watching way too many lies?

2026-09-11 14:32:09 UTC

- reply

i thought you were on suitcoin

2026-09-11 14:31:38 UTC

- reply

if you really have been watching matthew over years, and think he is a broken clock. you are lost already.

2026-09-11 14:07:17 UTC

- reply

what makes bitcoin, bitcoin?