FernandoTheKoala / FernandoTheKoala is on Nostr

Just a man who is very curious, loves to learn and discuss ideas.
Planning to post drums and other creative hobbies of mine as a sort of diary.
Love and good vibes ♥️🤘

Last Notes

2026-07-16 18:28:14 UTC

- reply

We are on the same team man, I'm just worried that this has been rushed too much (and is not even the right technical solution) and we will lose all the momentum accumulated so far.
IMO waiting a little longer for gaining more support and planning a better solution would have been more beneficial.
Knots went from basically zero to 22% in one year. If we had waited a little while core might have come up with another very controversial update and we would have been at 40/50%
Honestly I hoped a third and 4th implementation would have popped up. My main concern was the 99% centralization of the implementation
I don't know, let's see how it goes ♥️

2026-07-16 12:03:02 UTC

- reply

The question is not what bip-110 is about.
The question is what happens to the "achievements" obtained so far if bip-110 fails

2026-07-15 19:25:36 UTC

- reply

Hey man you are one of the people I consider trustworthy, if you got time to give me your opinion on this:
I run knots (because they way core handled the whole op-return thing showed very worrying signs for me) but I don't support bip110 (I'm completely aligned on the intention, but the methodology and timing is not right for me).
I was very happy that we got 22% of nodes switching to knots (we need more implementation with more shares), but this bip110 seems very rushed and maybe we have better ways (and better planned) to voice/show the btc we believe in.
If bip110 fails and we hard fork (i guess we will find out in 3 weeks), didn't we "waste" the achievement of having 22% nodes switch to another btc implementation?
I don't think this op-return is the battle worth dying for right now