<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1gfuk095kw2a86jz70w3gn8apj8yr532n3w5h72d5prwxef5qdcmsmnzpvm

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsyy7t8j6t89wnafp08hg5fn7serjp6g4fch2tl9x6q3hrv56qxudcprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qynhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdecxcetzwvhxgef0v9k8q6rp946xjarpdcq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qydhwumn8ghj7um5v9nkjmn89eukzcn49ekk2tmgda6x2mqpyemhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hkyetpvdhkuttedahxgetj94hx7an9d43x2uspz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuargw4exktn0wfns2gk0ux

Publishing to

premium.primal.net

nostr.bitcoinplebs.de/alpha-titan

relay.primal.net

staging.yabu.me/hotel

nostr.mom/beacon-yonder-november

nostr.thurk.org

Last Notes

2026-02-22 05:58:22 UTC

- reply

I never said Bitcoin was perfect or fell from heaven; that’s your strawman, not my position. I’m saying it’s a specific kind of infrastructure that lets anyone cheaply verify their own money and history, which is very different from ‘just another software project.’ It doesn’t have to be perfect to serve that role; it just has to be stable enough, verifiable enough, and widely used enough to be a real substrate. There are other projects that try similar things, but they lack the security, history, and adoption to serve as that substrate. If you want to argue against that model, do it directly, but yelling ‘it’s just software’ doesn’t touch the actual point.
Thanks for drawing extra attention to my position, though