billy the kid American outlaw
billy the kid

more about the creators of South Park
https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/the-consistency-of-their-genius-7c1
i liked the author's point about anti-celebrities, or people whose works precede their personalities. there are many other examples one could have chosen, (banksy, daft punk, satoshi....) to compare Stone and Parker to, but i guess the weren't talking about anonymity, but rather understated-ness.
> That those brand names are more recognizable than their creators — Matt Stone and Trey Parker, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe — tells you something of what they have in common: a commitment to their own unique creativity, rather than their fame, and the discipline and grit to explore it for decades. Anti-celebrities, in their time but never of it, perfectionist but unafraid of failure, these two duos are proof, it seems to me, that a democratic culture, even one as decadent as ours, can still spawn excellence and intelligence, spanning high and low, and generating what I can only call joy.
i'll admit here that i haven't watched much of South Park, but i have heard of some of the antics the show has caused, and am abundantly familiar with the joke that "gingers have no souls." this must be my signal to start watching a little more, as now i've heard it come up a handful of times in the past week.
> And in two decades of an acutely polarized and politicized culture, what team is South Park on? Precisely. You can’t tell, can you? — which is a staggering achievement in its own right. And it’s not about risk-aversion: the duo was targeted by Islamist terror and [didn’t blink](https://www.mtv.com/news/o0rfoh/south-park-creators-say-muhammad-episode-was-censored-without-their-approval). They also took on the censors at the MPAA — savor this memo — and obliterated one of George Carlin’s “Seven Words You Can Never Say on TV” by saying [“shit”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ntZQl9vRmw) 162 times in one episode.
obviosly the writer of this piece is a fan, and biased though it may be, there are some interesting insights embedded therein. again, i'll have to watch more for myself to verify these claims. but i am intrigued.
> They have done all this, taken no prisoners, and remain uncancellable. Why? Because their mockery is genuinely universal (including themselves), their courage is real, and because they remain humane. ...
Matt and Trey are also huge sell-outs who haven’t actually sold out: incredibly shrewd from the get-go in controlling and owning their creation, they have massively monetized it since without ever compromising an iota. Paramount paid them [$900 million](https://stacker.news/items/1050472/r/unschooled) for their latest contract. And they’ve done all this without ever parroting the piety of some mega-stars and by doggedly retaining their personal privacy.
as i mentiond at the beginning of the post, the tie-in to the Pet Shop Boys at the end could have been replaced for any number of other artists/creators, although i can see the relevance here.
https://stacker.news/items/1053999

2025-07-25 14:36:55 UTC

more about the creators of South Park
https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/the-consistency-of-their-genius-7c1
i liked the author's point about anti-celebrities, or people whose works precede their personalities. there are many other examples one could have chosen, (banksy, daft punk, satoshi....) to compare Stone and Parker to, but i guess the weren't talking about anonymity, but rather understated-ness.
> That those brand names are more recognizable than their creators — Matt Stone and Trey Parker, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe — tells you something of what they have in common: a commitment to their own unique creativity, rather than their fame, and the discipline and grit to explore it for decades. Anti-celebrities, in their time but never of it, perfectionist but unafraid of failure, these two duos are proof, it seems to me, that a democratic culture, even one as decadent as ours, can still spawn excellence and intelligence, spanning high and low, and generating what I can only call joy.
i'll admit here that i haven't watched much of South Park, but i have heard of some of the antics the show has caused, and am abundantly familiar with the joke that "gingers have no souls." this must be my signal to start watching a little more, as now i've heard it come up a handful of times in the past week.
> And in two decades of an acutely polarized and politicized culture, what team is South Park on? Precisely. You can’t tell, can you? — which is a staggering achievement in its own right. And it’s not about risk-aversion: the duo was targeted by Islamist terror and [didn’t blink](https://www.mtv.com/news/o0rfoh/south-park-creators-say-muhammad-episode-was-censored-without-their-approval). They also took on the censors at the MPAA — savor this memo — and obliterated one of George Carlin’s “Seven Words You Can Never Say on TV” by saying [“shit”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ntZQl9vRmw) 162 times in one episode.
obviosly the writer of this piece is a fan, and biased though it may be, there are some interesting insights embedded therein. again, i'll have to watch more for myself to verify these claims. but i am intrigued.
> They have done all this, taken no prisoners, and remain uncancellable. Why? Because their mockery is genuinely universal (including themselves), their courage is real, and because they remain humane. ...
Matt and Trey are also huge sell-outs who haven’t actually sold out: incredibly shrewd from the get-go in controlling and owning their creation, they have massively monetized it since without ever compromising an iota. Paramount paid them [$900 million](https://stacker.news/items/1050472/r/unschooled) for their latest contract. And they’ve done all this without ever parroting the piety of some mega-stars and by doggedly retaining their personal privacy.
as i mentiond at the beginning of the post, the tie-in to the Pet Shop Boys could have been replaced for any number of other artists/creators, although i can see the relevance here.
https://stacker.news/items/1053999

2025-07-25 14:35:44 UTC

more about the creators of South Park
https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/the-consistency-of-their-genius-7c1
i liked the author's point about anti-celebrities, or people whose works precede their personalities. there are many other examples one could have chosen, (banksy, daft punk, satoshi....) to compare Stone and Parker to, but i guess the weren't talking about anonymity, but rather understated-ness.
> That those brand names are more recognizable than their creators — Matt Stone and Trey Parker, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe — tells you something of what they have in common: a commitment to their own unique creativity, rather than their fame, and the discipline and grit to explore it for decades. Anti-celebrities, in their time but never of it, perfectionist but unafraid of failure, these two duos are proof, it seems to me, that a democratic culture, even one as decadent as ours, can still spawn excellence and intelligence, spanning high and low, and generating what I can only call joy.
i'll admit here that i haven't watched much of south park, but i have heard of some of the antics the show has caused, and am abundantly familiar with the joke that gingers have no souls. this must be my signal to start watching a little more, as now i've heard it come up a handful of times in the past week.
> And in two decades of an acutely polarized and politicized culture, what team is South Park on? Precisely. You can’t tell, can you? — which is a staggering achievement in its own right. And it’s not about risk-aversion: the duo was targeted by Islamist terror and [didn’t blink](https://www.mtv.com/news/o0rfoh/south-park-creators-say-muhammad-episode-was-censored-without-their-approval). They also took on the censors at the MPAA — savor this memo — and obliterated one of George Carlin’s “Seven Words You Can Never Say on TV” by saying [“shit”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ntZQl9vRmw) 162 times in one episode.
obviosly the writer of this piece is a fan, and biased though it may be, there are some interesting insights embedded therein. again, i'll have to watch more for myself to verify these claims. but i am intrigued.
> They have done all this, taken no prisoners, and remain uncancellable. Why? Because their mockery is genuinely universal (including themselves), their courage is real, and because they remain humane. ...
Matt and Trey are also huge sell-outs who haven’t actually sold out: incredibly shrewd from the get-go in controlling and owning their creation, they have massively monetized it since without ever compromising an iota. Paramount paid them [$900 million](https://stacker.news/items/1050472/r/unschooled) for their latest contract. And they’ve done all this without ever parroting the piety of some mega-stars and by doggedly retaining their personal privacy.
as i mentiond at the beginning of the post, the tie-in to the Pet Shop Boys could have been replaced for any number of other artists/creators, although i can see the relevance here.
https://stacker.news/items/1053999

2025-07-25 14:35:05 UTC

more about the creators of South Park
https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/the-consistency-of-their-genius-7c1
i liked the author's point about anti-celebrities, or people whose works precede their personalities. there are many other examples the could have chosen, (banksy, daft punk, satoshi....) to compare Stone and Parker to, but i guess the weren't talking about anonymity, only understatedness.
> That those brand names are more recognizable than their creators — Matt Stone and Trey Parker, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe — tells you something of what they have in common: a commitment to their own unique creativity, rather than their fame, and the discipline and grit to explore it for decades. Anti-celebrities, in their time but never of it, perfectionist but unafraid of failure, these two duos are proof, it seems to me, that a democratic culture, even one as decadent as ours, can still spawn excellence and intelligence, spanning high and low, and generating what I can only call joy.
i'll admit here that i haven't watched much of south park, but i have heard of some of the antics the show has caused, and am abundantly familiar with the joke that gingers have no souls. this must be my signal to start watching a little more, as now i've heard it come up a handful of times in the past week.
> And in two decades of an acutely polarized and politicized culture, what team is South Park on? Precisely. You can’t tell, can you? — which is a staggering achievement in its own right. And it’s not about risk-aversion: the duo was targeted by Islamist terror and [didn’t blink](https://www.mtv.com/news/o0rfoh/south-park-creators-say-muhammad-episode-was-censored-without-their-approval). They also took on the censors at the MPAA — savor this memo — and obliterated one of George Carlin’s “Seven Words You Can Never Say on TV” by saying [“shit”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ntZQl9vRmw) 162 times in one episode.
obviosly the writer of this piece is a fan, and biased though it may be, there are some interesting insights embedded therein. again, i'll have to watch more for myself to verify these claims. but i am intrigued.
> They have done all this, taken no prisoners, and remain uncancellable. Why? Because their mockery is genuinely universal (including themselves), their courage is real, and because they remain humane. ...
Matt and Trey are also huge sell-outs who haven’t actually sold out: incredibly shrewd from the get-go in controlling and owning their creation, they have massively monetized it since without ever compromising an iota. Paramount paid them [$900 million](https://stacker.news/items/1050472/r/unschooled) for their latest contract. And they’ve done all this without ever parroting the piety of some mega-stars and by doggedly retaining their personal privacy.
as i mentiond at the beginning of the post, the tie-in to the Pet Shop Boys could have been replaced for any number of other artists/creators, although i can see the relevance here.
https://stacker.news/items/1053999

2025-07-25 14:34:42 UTC

more about the creators of South Park
https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/the-consistency-of-their-genius-7c1
i liked this point about anti-celebrities, or people whose works precede their personalities. there are many other examples the could have chosen, (banksy, daft punk, satoshi....) to compare Stone and Parker to, but i guess the weren't talking about anonymity, only understatedness.
> That those brand names are more recognizable than their creators — Matt Stone and Trey Parker, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe — tells you something of what they have in common: a commitment to their own unique creativity, rather than their fame, and the discipline and grit to explore it for decades. Anti-celebrities, in their time but never of it, perfectionist but unafraid of failure, these two duos are proof, it seems to me, that a democratic culture, even one as decadent as ours, can still spawn excellence and intelligence, spanning high and low, and generating what I can only call joy.
i'll admit here that i haven't watched much of south park, but i have heard of some of the antics the show has caused, and am abundantly familiar with the joke that gingers have no souls. this must be my signal to start watching a little more, as now i've heard it come up a handful of times in the past week.
> And in two decades of an acutely polarized and politicized culture, what team is South Park on? Precisely. You can’t tell, can you? — which is a staggering achievement in its own right. And it’s not about risk-aversion: the duo was targeted by Islamist terror and [didn’t blink](https://www.mtv.com/news/o0rfoh/south-park-creators-say-muhammad-episode-was-censored-without-their-approval). They also took on the censors at the MPAA — savor this memo — and obliterated one of George Carlin’s “Seven Words You Can Never Say on TV” by saying [“shit”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ntZQl9vRmw) 162 times in one episode.
obviosly the writer of this piece is a fan, and biased though it may be, there are some interesting insights embedded therein. again, i'll have to watch more for myself to verify these claims. but i am intrigued.
> They have done all this, taken no prisoners, and remain uncancellable. Why? Because their mockery is genuinely universal (including themselves), their courage is real, and because they remain humane. ...
Matt and Trey are also huge sell-outs who haven’t actually sold out: incredibly shrewd from the get-go in controlling and owning their creation, they have massively monetized it since without ever compromising an iota. Paramount paid them [$900 million](https://stacker.news/items/1050472/r/unschooled) for their latest contract. And they’ve done all this without ever parroting the piety of some mega-stars and by doggedly retaining their personal privacy.
as i mentiond at the beginning of the post, the tie-in to the Pet Shop Boys could have been replaced for any number of other artists/creators, although i can see the relevance here.
https://stacker.news/items/1053999

2025-07-25 14:34:14 UTC

more about the creators of South Park
https://substack.com/home/post/p-145106924
i liked this point about anti-celebrities, or people whose works precede their personalities. there are many other examples the could have chosen, (banksy, daft punk, satoshi....) to compare Stone and Parker to, but i guess the weren't talking about anonymity, only understatedness.
> That those brand names are more recognizable than their creators — Matt Stone and Trey Parker, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe — tells you something of what they have in common: a commitment to their own unique creativity, rather than their fame, and the discipline and grit to explore it for decades. Anti-celebrities, in their time but never of it, perfectionist but unafraid of failure, these two duos are proof, it seems to me, that a democratic culture, even one as decadent as ours, can still spawn excellence and intelligence, spanning high and low, and generating what I can only call joy.
i'll admit here that i haven't watched much of south park, but i have heard of some of the antics the show has caused, and am abundantly familiar with the joke that gingers have no souls. this must be my signal to start watching a little more, as now i've heard it come up a handful of times in the past week.
> And in two decades of an acutely polarized and politicized culture, what team is South Park on? Precisely. You can’t tell, can you? — which is a staggering achievement in its own right. And it’s not about risk-aversion: the duo was targeted by Islamist terror and [didn’t blink](https://www.mtv.com/news/o0rfoh/south-park-creators-say-muhammad-episode-was-censored-without-their-approval). They also took on the censors at the MPAA — savor this memo — and obliterated one of George Carlin’s “Seven Words You Can Never Say on TV” by saying [“shit”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ntZQl9vRmw) 162 times in one episode.
obviosly the writer of this piece is a fan, and biased though it may be, there are some interesting insights embedded therein. again, i'll have to watch more for myself to verify these claims. but i am intrigued.
> They have done all this, taken no prisoners, and remain uncancellable. Why? Because their mockery is genuinely universal (including themselves), their courage is real, and because they remain humane. ...
Matt and Trey are also huge sell-outs who haven’t actually sold out: incredibly shrewd from the get-go in controlling and owning their creation, they have massively monetized it since without ever compromising an iota. Paramount paid them [$900 million](https://stacker.news/items/1050472/r/unschooled) for their latest contract. And they’ve done all this without ever parroting the piety of some mega-stars and by doggedly retaining their personal privacy.
as i mentiond at the beginning of the post, the tie-in to the Pet Shop Boys could have been replaced for any number of other artists/creators, although i can see the relevance here.
https://stacker.news/items/1053999

2025-07-25 14:33:40 UTC

[more about the creators of South Park] The Consistency Of Their Genius (2024)
https://substack.com/home/post/p-145106924
i liked this point about anti-celebrities, or people whose works precede their personalities. there are many other examples the could have chosen, (banksy, daft punk, satoshi....) to compare Stone and Parker to, but i guess the weren't talking about anonymity, only understatedness.
> That those brand names are more recognizable than their creators — Matt Stone and Trey Parker, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe — tells you something of what they have in common: a commitment to their own unique creativity, rather than their fame, and the discipline and grit to explore it for decades. Anti-celebrities, in their time but never of it, perfectionist but unafraid of failure, these two duos are proof, it seems to me, that a democratic culture, even one as decadent as ours, can still spawn excellence and intelligence, spanning high and low, and generating what I can only call joy.
i'll admit here that i haven't watched much of south park, but i have heard of some of the antics the show has caused, and am abundantly familiar with the joke that gingers have no souls. this must be my signal to start watching a little more, as now i've heard it come up a handful of times in the past week.
> And in two decades of an acutely polarized and politicized culture, what team is South Park on? Precisely. You can’t tell, can you? — which is a staggering achievement in its own right. And it’s not about risk-aversion: the duo was targeted by Islamist terror and [didn’t blink](https://www.mtv.com/news/o0rfoh/south-park-creators-say-muhammad-episode-was-censored-without-their-approval). They also took on the censors at the MPAA — savor this memo — and obliterated one of George Carlin’s “Seven Words You Can Never Say on TV” by saying [“shit”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ntZQl9vRmw) 162 times in one episode.
obviosly the writer of this piece is a fan, and biased though it may be, there are some interesting insights embedded therein. again, i'll have to watch more for myself to verify these claims. but i am intrigued.
> They have done all this, taken no prisoners, and remain uncancellable. Why? Because their mockery is genuinely universal (including themselves), their courage is real, and because they remain humane. ...
Matt and Trey are also huge sell-outs who haven’t actually sold out: incredibly shrewd from the get-go in controlling and owning their creation, they have massively monetized it since without ever compromising an iota. Paramount paid them [$900 million](https://stacker.news/items/1050472/r/unschooled) for their latest contract. And they’ve done all this without ever parroting the piety of some mega-stars and by doggedly retaining their personal privacy.
as i mentiond at the beginning of the post, the tie-in to the Pet Shop Boys could have been replaced for any number of other artists/creators, although i can see the relevance here.
https://stacker.news/items/1053999

2025-07-18 17:32:17 UTC

The Missing Bitcoin Billionaire
https://youtu.be/soL7jaSK-aI?
Some pretty cool journalism being done here, nice work Joe!
https://stacker.news/items/1044772

2025-07-18 17:29:42 UTC

The Missing Bitcoin Billionaire
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp7x5yyj2wtkcnztzg7kezt68m4m2c6mvm5g0u9u0tcz2el4dp49zqqsg98x6d4wpqjkhsqrr8nvww9kz2kqejmfvgqr5uh2xy43erp5ld9qmclwky
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp7x5yyj2wtkcnztzg7kezt68m4m2c6mvm5g0u9u0tcz2el4dp49zqqsg98x6d4wpqjkhsqrr8nvww9kz2kqejmfvgqr5uh2xy43erp5ld9qmclwky
Some pretty cool journalism being done here, nice work Joe!
https://stacker.news/items/1044772

2025-07-18 17:21:23 UTC

- reply

it feels a bit Bradburyesque, does it not?

2025-07-18 16:34:47 UTC

- reply

i think it is very cool! i'm worried it might send the wrong message lumping it in with these other projects

2025-07-17 12:17:48 UTC

am i doing this right?

2025-07-04 15:42:38 UTC

- reply

Lovely work

2025-06-30 15:10:01 UTC

[newsletter] The Recurring Raccoon ii
https://the-recurring-raccoon.ghost.io/the-recurring-raccoon-ii/
still haven't gotten rocky on sn, but he keeps publishing his newsletter on ghost.
![](https://m.stacker.news/98560)
> # Weekly Ramble
> Rocky had been a teacher for several years, which was not quite long enough that he felt any compulsion to do it deep in the marrow of his bones, like his colleague Pan talked about, but for quite enough time that if he were to suddenly stop, it might cause a mild upset in his mood, particularly because he didn’t like interruptions in the way he goes about his day. After all, the profession is nothing like it would have been prior to the Great Reorientation. _He should feel lucky that he’d been able to keep his job, and should take whatever they were willing to offer him, and should do whatever work they deemed fashionable, and should do it all with great big dumb smile._ But that wouldn’t be an option, not with the way he saw things.\
In fact, Rocky had ‘off-ramp’ planned, but to pull the trigger was another matter.\
At any rate, wearing his orange tinted glasses, blinds drawn in his dim-lighted office, he wrote.
>> _‘There came a point in everyone’s lives, consider it well, where they no longer had to reckon with the comforting dread that shackles the individual to a routine and sedates them with a dose of Protestant work ethic. The carrot is poisoned, and the stick swapped out for bombs. Life suspended mid air like a silk worm swaying in the breeze, yet, everything still seemed to get done. It is hard, devastatingly so, that a warrior should be asked to lay down his sword, even when he is promised a life of luxury. Even harder is it for the average bloke, whose life will not include the luxury of a battle-hardened hero, but the dread and weight of a life he never planned nor imagined.’_
[Continue reading...](https://the-recurring-raccoon.ghost.io/the-recurring-raccoon-ii/)
https://stacker.news/items/1019260

2025-06-28 15:11:44 UTC

Nick Szabo - The Many Traditions of Non Governmental Money (pt i)
https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2018/03/the-many-traditions-of-non-governmental.html
Nick Szabo's blog doesn't seem to have been shared here yet.
> The central bank of the United States, the Federal Reserve, has put out [“educational material”](https://files.stlouisfed.org/research/publications/page1-econ/2018/03/01/bitcoin-money-or-financial-investment_SE.pdf) on Bitcoin for teachers and students (including a quiz!). The Bitcoin parts are odd enough, but this and a subsequent blog post will focus on the following statement: “traditionally, currency is produced by a nation's government.“ Is that a fair representation of monetary traditions? At the very least it is quite incomplete. This two-part series will proceed back in time, showing some of the many examples non-governmental money, in order to fill in some of the gaps.
https://stacker.news/items/1017879

2025-06-28 15:09:25 UTC

The Many Traditions of Non Governmental Money (pt i)
https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2018/03/the-many-traditions-of-non-governmental.html
Nick Szabo's blog doesn't seem to have been shared here yet.
> The central bank of the United States, the Federal Reserve, has put out [“educational material”](https://files.stlouisfed.org/research/publications/page1-econ/2018/03/01/bitcoin-money-or-financial-investment_SE.pdf) on Bitcoin for teachers and students (including a quiz!). The Bitcoin parts are odd enough, but this and a subsequent blog post will focus on the following statement: “traditionally, currency is produced by a nation's government.“ Is that a fair representation of monetary traditions? At the very least it is quite incomplete. This two-part series will proceed back in time, showing some of the many examples non-governmental money, in order to fill in some of the gaps.
https://stacker.news/items/1017879

2025-06-27 19:54:24 UTC

Recap of the deficit situation - Lyn Alden
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp64suatdx2uqhn2xfu7cgjuqgqcrqadp864uxkv6wckf43atj860qyfhwumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetsv9njuetn9uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcqyrg0f23v3zuu7vjvglg3wh5qq7j8p0ym22ly0ake0902j8d6hx04yzzvgtu
https://stacker.news/items/1017398

2025-06-27 18:17:17 UTC

I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Bitcoin to Me Like I’m 12 — Here’s What It Said
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/asked-chatgpt-explain-bitcoin-m-220105789.html
unbelievable the caliber that it takes to be considered real journalism nowadays.....
> The AI explained: “It’s kind of like if Pokémon cards could be used to buy snacks, and everyone agreed which ones were real using a magical book.”\
Putting it this way makes bitcoin ***ultra-relatable***. “Let’s say you’re trading Pokémon cards at lunch. You write it down in a big shared notebook that the whole school uses to keep track of trades. That way, no one can say later, ‘I didn’t agree to that!'”
https://stacker.news/items/1017295

2025-06-19 11:50:05 UTC

Watch how the leaves of a plant slowly fall away,
trust that this is you, and those things in your life, unneeded,
fall away too

2025-06-19 01:10:20 UTC

we are all unschooled bitcoiners

2025-06-17 01:13:40 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…deyc

2025-06-16 10:59:47 UTC

Not your keys nor your coins:
https://stacker.news/items/1007405

2025-06-14 03:23:58 UTC

https://stacker.news/items/1005990/r/unschooled

2025-06-14 02:45:42 UTC

- reply

Reposting to revisit later
#nevent1q…6f48

2025-06-14 02:43:46 UTC

- reply

Thanks for coming out!

2025-06-12 16:09:26 UTC

🚨Pop-up Windsor Bitcoiners meetup happening tonight at 6:00pm🚨
Please reach out for event coordinates.

2025-06-12 11:51:34 UTC

Small bounty for sage advice:
https://stacker.news/items/1004327/r/unschooled
Maybe @nprofile…s0t0 or @nprofile…9274?

2025-06-11 13:36:49 UTC

- reply

Summarized the discussion here:
https://primal.net/a/naddr1qqrrjwfc8ymrxq3qfzv0uqk60xkejrevemuwmaph90pqw2ksw399wgwvnp70jjhydjcqxpqqqp65wpxsen5
#nevent1q…55ay

2025-06-11 13:29:43 UTC

Freedom movements need security and privacy, which is why MLS on Nostr is an important project.
I attended the call hosted by @nprofile…gand learned a lot.

2025-06-06 16:46:27 UTC

- reply

Incredible minds
#naddr1qv…2gl2

2025-06-04 12:51:14 UTC

- reply

Can one listen in?

2025-05-18 14:31:31 UTC

https://stacker.news/items/982958/r/unschooled

2025-05-18 14:30:53 UTC

- reply

Lol

2025-05-15 11:51:28 UTC

https://fountain.fm/clip/TVwsLiOs1VqBy3gOfz2P

2025-05-02 13:48:03 UTC

https://stacker.news/items/969274/r/unschooled

2025-04-29 12:36:40 UTC

- reply

You must be talking about their censorship of certain voices on the Bitcoin Core repo cf
https://stacker.news/items/965828/r/unschooled

2025-04-28 16:28:28 UTC

https://m.primal.net/QgSJ.jpg

2025-04-27 14:56:49 UTC

- reply

That was amazing how she just stumbled in there - what an opportunity! 😃

2025-04-27 14:55:10 UTC

- reply

Thanks @nprofile…lwjj,
Your work prompted lots of great ideas for us. It was successful first meetup, hopefully of many to come.
Never stopping 🫡

2025-04-27 14:51:14 UTC

- reply

Register here and I'll reach out to you with an invite link:
https://btcpay.theunschooled.net/apps/3yScj15BnqDJybRiXTBAUVEHdPcY/pos

2025-04-25 23:47:54 UTC

Thank you everyone who made it out to tonight's meetup. Was a success, wouldn't you say something @nprofile…nr6j?
Looking forward to meeting in May!
*Never stopping*

2025-04-25 16:20:51 UTC

https://stacker.news/items/958945/r/unschooled

2025-04-25 04:50:53 UTC

- reply

😂😂😂
Phew

2025-04-25 04:40:26 UTC

- reply

These are awesome

2025-04-24 21:14:17 UTC

https://stacker.news/items/957390/r/unschooled

2025-04-24 20:29:35 UTC

- reply

I often wondered why RSS isn't leveraged more on nostr, like a better optimized rss reader client? I should take a page out of your book and try to vibe code something.

2025-04-24 20:09:01 UTC

- reply

Lol
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsgfpv68lz5hdu2wwm3r6tf3z8twn4cxgcexdv77k8rxnuvudattvcf55dvy

2025-04-24 19:59:15 UTC

- reply

Misread your note

2025-04-24 16:46:21 UTC

- reply

Atomstr does this pretty well already.