<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4spr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6er9wch8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2qg4waehxw309ajxjar5duh8qatz9aex2mrp0yq3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7qgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqgawaehxw309ahx7um5wgkhqatz9emk2mrvdaexgetj9ehx2aqa039e9

Publishing to

nostr-dev.wellorder.net

nostr-pub.wellorder.net

Last Notes

2026-08-07 21:09:09 UTC

Red Team is an effort to make it appear that all the software in Bitcoin is riddled with bugs. As I said, most of what they'll turn up is inconsequential.
It is happening in parallel with an obvious state-level attack against sovereign hodlers (Coldcard users, Lightning users, BTCPay Server users) seeking to 6102 as many bitcoins as possible.
The former is a coordinated tactic to obfuscate the latter.

2026-08-06 14:05:06 UTC

Current perspective -
They tried to crudely wrestle control of Bitcoin away from the sovereigns with the "hard forks" in 2017.
They realized that it just doesn't work. So instead this time around there's a Fabian style infestation of the space and it has become captured rather than overtly conquered.
It's very hard to defend against this because the attacks are all small enough to make any concrete pushback appear to be an overreaction.
Anyone who can extrapolate forward can see that anything that undermines Bitcoin's identity as a monetary protocol, if not rejected decisively, results in eventual death.
It's not here to compliment the dollar, it's here to replace and destroy it. Cope to the tune of "trojan horses" is now and always was self deception.
Protocol capture is real and the norm for freedom tech that reaches levels Bitcoin has.
People continue to underestimate the threat Bitcoin poses to the system and refuse to understand the lengths to which that system will go in neutering it.
I'll have more to say over the coming days as we establish whether the industry still respects the decentralization necessary to maintain our disruptive potential or if it chooses to close ranks and become a servant of the fiat apparatus currently coopting the network.

2026-08-05 19:40:41 UTC

- reply

Interesting in that way and many others.
But how could you ever send "back"? They don't know any of the relevant info.
A more realistic thing in this line of thinking would simply be moving it around on the BIP110 chain to make people reject it.

2026-08-03 03:00:24 UTC

Is amethyst junk or nostr abandonware?

2026-08-03 02:59:51 UTC

- reply

❤

2026-08-03 02:59:24 UTC

- reply

Sorry man, my nostr barely works.

2026-08-01 15:18:23 UTC

Apparently this was not a serious question as you have ignored all responses. And seem to be only interested in taking shots at people.
#nevent1q…zcrv

2026-07-31 15:43:33 UTC

- reply

Just went and dug up receipts from you. I advise not being frivolous when people bring up real concerns in advance of them blowing up. BIP110 is people trying to get ahead of a problem rather than wait. https://npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr.blossom.band/ff0fdf233a6364e0110466b5af02687d96a1486a4f0bcbb09b3c4c2067d5e560.jpg

2026-07-31 14:32:37 UTC

- reply

Further to that, my confidence is based primarily on two factors.
1. Prior success of minority driven UASF. BIP-148. It had less adoption and faced genuine opposition from miners who are largely indifferent to BIP-110.
2. Having verified the adoption and its authenticity.

2026-07-31 14:28:39 UTC

- reply

Well I just wonder where you're getting "2000 nodes that have mostly no monetary activity" from.

2026-07-30 05:11:42 UTC

- reply

It is literally the case. People against run URSFs.

2026-07-29 01:02:07 UTC

If 19% want X
And 81% don't care
Then X is very likely to occur

2026-07-24 22:26:47 UTC

- reply

Desktop: Primal and Nostrudel
Graphene: Amethyst

2026-07-24 20:45:56 UTC

My DMs are totally broken on Nostr.

2026-07-20 05:48:55 UTC

I love it when monetary maxis find blocks ❤ https://npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr.blossom.band/77042712a13e0079a779b2e3eca388aa60fa6c5eb6b1914feacd66bc5cd47ae4.jpg

2026-07-13 19:43:04 UTC

- reply

Channels opens fail.
Peers appear offline who arent.
Channels aren't showing up in the GUI that exist
Payments made via open channels to well connected peers with plenty of liquidity all fail

2026-07-13 08:16:03 UTC

- reply

I did a splice and it fucked the node.

2026-07-12 00:58:02 UTC

My Core Lightning node is fucked.

2026-07-11 21:13:43 UTC

- reply

2:30am is peak performance.

2026-07-11 19:20:58 UTC

We spend one third of our lives asleep and two thirds awake.
I have never had to replace the battery in a smoke alarm during the two thirds period.

2026-07-10 00:56:55 UTC

Heh
#nevent1q…vzz6

2026-07-06 02:20:50 UTC

- reply

Link? Mine was Canadian Dollars btw

2026-07-05 21:49:21 UTC

- reply

Thanks!

2026-07-05 21:08:39 UTC

When is this going to end 😫
https://blossom.primal.net/9ead59d8fa43e27caba219b24e4c932d48095bf242bcd9a46e254b2ef536a447.png

2026-06-29 16:03:36 UTC

- reply

Thanks, stoked to see it

2026-06-29 07:47:18 UTC

- reply

How does it compare to the abandoned v1?

2026-06-26 20:34:09 UTC

- reply

Oof

2026-06-25 05:13:46 UTC

- reply

Bitdis.org
No obviously not. Feel free to ask a serious question.

2026-06-25 05:10:29 UTC

- reply

I don't know. This starts to get beyond my technical ability. There's a fork of miniscript that provably won't create OP_IFs in taproot. Nunchuk's main issue was a template for the "custom" option which crudely dumped an old P2SH script into Taproot. It was demonstrated to be a really bad idea as it was just a more expensive way of doing it without any of the benefits of taproot.
The solution is for wallet devs to make sure they don't generate addresses that will result in UTXOs that people can't spend. The work has been done, and the fork looks fairly likely to be successful at this point so there isn't really time to waste.

2026-06-24 18:21:05 UTC

- reply

My threshold for credulity is met. It has what BIP-148 had the day before it activated.
There are other factors but Bitmain this time isn't against it, and instead ambivalent.
Seems more likely than not that is succeeds, and those who disagree seem far more blinded by pride and emotion to make a rational analysis.

2026-06-24 15:08:45 UTC

- reply

Nah they're fine it turns out.
No one actually using taproot for anything beyond JPG storage is using op if

2026-06-24 14:30:41 UTC

https://npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr.blossom.band/38e873ed2bd1f90a772e73682456aeac0413a63b20fa3993f3e772cf00dd370e.jpg

2026-06-23 21:09:04 UTC

- reply

It arrived long ago and is very much not dead.

2026-06-23 21:01:06 UTC

The small guys go first, not second.
If you want to wait for the big guys to tell you what's up, may I suggest waiting for the next FOMC meeting.
https://blossom.primal.net/54d048f648aefb40273f21712b5d8a96f09aaa26e98134e6a9a4fee3e7d2ed97.png

2026-06-01 21:11:39 UTC

- reply

Yup

2026-06-01 21:07:05 UTC

Just came here to pour gasoline on the dog pile going on against NVK over the shit he's pulling stonewalling SeedSigner.
Fucking shameful. @nprofile…rrsm

2026-03-23 02:51:47 UTC

- reply

I'm read-only on the important DB - for now at least.

2026-03-23 02:38:46 UTC

Gonna have to get good at SQL some day.

2026-03-23 02:38:15 UTC

- reply

Graphene is android with less hassle so I don't see how it could present much friction.
NixOS confused the heck out of me.

2026-03-20 23:55:10 UTC

Man I can't believe TempleOS is implementing age verification

2026-03-19 15:43:55 UTC

- reply

It's irrelevant. Miners can pay themselves a million Bitcoins with an invalid block today if they want. The reason they don't is the same as the reason they'd mine BIP-110 valid blocks. All that matters is how widely enforced the rules are aka decentralization.

2026-03-13 15:55:37 UTC

I miss when the Simpsons was right about everything - that was just depressing.
Now it's Futurama that's right about everything which is leaves me fearful for our lives.

2026-03-07 22:39:37 UTC

- reply

I don't think so, it would be directionally correct to somehow eliminate the witness discount (at least for non-monetary uses) but it's a completely different market.
A vintage car used as a collector's item does not naturally fall to the price of a used Prius as they are used different purposes.

2026-03-07 20:12:17 UTC

- reply

1. I'm not against L2s
2. The assertion that idiots run out of money is baseless
Think

2026-03-07 18:49:14 UTC

- reply

Do you believe casinos will eventually cease to exist also?

2026-03-07 17:35:10 UTC

- reply

It is jot a coincidence that this "generic database" contained primarily financial activity until 2023.
That was the result of responsible decision making and careful design.
That has all been abandoned for the purposes of bringing crypto scams to Bitcoin, rationalized with hollow ideological claims that undermine sincere engineering efforts to reduce non-monetary usage of Bitcoin.
"Bitcoin is permissionless!"
"That is not spam, they're valid transactions!"
...as though those things are meant to mean we cannot be permitted to acknowledge and fix issues preventing the network from functioning correctly.

2026-03-07 17:34:56 UTC

- reply

Best? No. Inevitable if BIP-110 and efforts like it fail? Yes.

2026-03-07 17:33:09 UTC

- reply

And yet I've heard it from many respected minds in the space. @nprofile…dtkh

2026-03-07 17:12:27 UTC

If Bitcoin is not optimized for financial activity, people will transact off chain using trusted third parties, and the blockchain will increasingly consist of junk data no one wants to store.
The assertion that Bitcoiners will out-price spammers is contrary to all evidence.

2026-03-04 11:34:31 UTC

- reply

I didn't say it's not permissionless dummy.

2026-03-03 17:25:15 UTC

- reply

Witness discount abuse

2026-03-03 15:58:04 UTC

- reply

There are no sides. There's just parasites using Bitcoin for storing trash. Then there's bitcoiners pushing back against it with a bunch of moronic influencors getting in the way.
Personal attacks are inevitable. I actually don't do a lot of it, though obviously lose patience every now and again. If *all you have* is personal attacks like Odell then yeah, people are going to call that out.
Also, it's incredibly stupid to judge BIP-110 because people you dislike are yelling at others about it. If you want civilized discourse you're really just asking for centralized decision making. It's chaotic, live with it.

2026-03-03 15:53:28 UTC

- reply

That's like saying scrambled eggs and omelettes are the same thing.
They are but wtf no they aren't.

2026-03-03 15:41:00 UTC

- reply

I am the worst of hipsters

2026-03-03 15:40:34 UTC

Half and half is not cream.

2026-02-25 17:44:30 UTC

- reply

Just actually comment on what the BIP does. You can combine it with all the personal attacks you want they just can't be *the entire substance of your complaint.*
Do you disagree with the tradeoff of killing OP_IF in taproot given that it's basically only used for spam and making taproot the opposite of the scaling tech it's meant to be?
Do you actually want OP_RETURNs to continue being consensus valid up to 1MB in size?
Do you see a pressing need to activate another softfork (that isn't CTV) during the year BIP-110 prevents them?
Is killing deeper-than-7 trees in taproot going to create some issues?

2026-02-25 17:38:40 UTC

- reply

Azure is worse

2026-02-25 05:37:29 UTC

Of course BIP-110 can fail.
For the exact same reason that Bitcoin itself can fail.
Users failing to meaningfully enforce its rules on a widespread enough basis.
That is all Bitcoin is and making that the priority is the motivation for the BIP in the first place.
Don't burden decentralized verification with anything else. *Ever*.

2026-02-24 23:43:03 UTC

- reply

Me too!

2026-02-23 20:35:50 UTC

- reply

What metaphysical things are missing from the discussion?

2026-02-23 20:34:58 UTC

- reply

He mentioned growth of the chain separately to the discussion around BIP-110. The BIP doesn't decrease block size to 300KB which was what that section of the podcast was about.

2026-02-23 18:37:34 UTC

Prompting Grok to save me time reading/rebutting Lopp's hit piece against BIP-110.
Pretty decent summary.
https://image.nostr.build/1175f7783107fcbdd5eff16268b25afeb0c64c7522323be95668f795483a2676.png

2026-02-23 00:50:46 UTC

- reply

100%
So many see Bitcoins as an investment or hedge against inflation.
Whilst the blockchain a junk yard for scams.

2026-02-22 01:00:20 UTC

- reply

It is in the real sense (should the monetary maxis end up succeeding with BIP-110)

2026-02-22 00:13:25 UTC

- reply

Appreciate the perspective. I consider Bitcoin to be alive and thus able to change itself when under attack to thwart the attack. Death is failing to react to changing environments and circumstances.

2026-02-21 21:09:56 UTC

- reply

You'd may need to URSF for that depending on how much support "my" fork gets.

2026-02-21 17:33:57 UTC

- reply

No, I'm a horrible coder and was a teenager when Bitcoin was being written.

2026-02-21 17:30:19 UTC

- reply

Respect

2026-02-21 07:13:47 UTC

- reply

Probably the latter. It's hard to ascertain the truth from these numbers and it's good to remember that it's gameable.
There's always the chance the nodes are all just fake so you have to incorporate other heuristics.
I've obviously verified for myself that many real people are out there running BIP-110.
People that attend conferences and pay attention in the space should be able to figure out how much energy there is behind things like this.

2026-02-21 05:47:08 UTC

According to bitnodes(.)io 7.8% of nodes are BIP-110.
Luke's stats have it more like 5.7%.
I'm sure some nodes have been spun up for appearances (equally sure that's true of Core nodes).
I think it's fair to say there's already some genuine grass roots support for BIP-110 whilst virtually zero from companies/miners.
It remains to be seen whether that's sufficient to draw in others.
One thing of note is that if it came the other way around (no grassroots support, but big companies and miners all pushing for it) that'd be a far greater red flag and I'm glad it's happening the way it is.

2026-02-21 01:29:43 UTC

- reply

Exactly, you have nothing.

2026-02-20 21:13:45 UTC

- reply

I don't want any control over anyone.
You're simply projecting on behalf of people trying to stifle an immune response. I've laid out clearly why I stopped running Core and switched to Knots, then BIP-110. Refute the rationale instead of making personal attacks.

2026-02-19 23:48:45 UTC

Hence BIP-110
#nevent1q…h5s0

2026-02-19 00:54:57 UTC

- reply

BIP-110

2026-02-18 02:16:33 UTC

- reply

I think we're not about to do any other soft fork upgrades in the next 12 months anyway. And leaving holes open of that nature isn't worth it in current context.

2026-02-17 01:58:28 UTC

- reply

🙏

2026-02-17 00:23:51 UTC

https://image.nostr.build/521ee621dd86781de312d224bfb972fb5ef8297cb6ef64e97f035ea9c4ba7b0d.jpg

2026-02-16 17:41:44 UTC

- reply

I have said this. I can't pretend the desire to use a proxy for the USD isn't preferable to worse fiat for the global south. And telling them they have to jump straight to Bitcoin and just deal with the volatility is distasteful.

2026-02-16 16:25:40 UTC

- reply

Because making it permanent means HFs or ossification.
Q2 is answered in the BIP -
https://image.nostr.build/e750c8287cd54d8e863726c52d7402e80e53991c0dec2a1ac3390fa3477c133f.jpg https://image.nostr.build/e750c8287cd54d8e863726c52d7402e80e53991c0dec2a1ac3390fa3477c133f.jpg

2026-02-16 16:15:57 UTC

- reply

Paying money to an unrelated third party doesn't make abuse consensual.
This is very basic ethics.

2026-02-16 16:14:16 UTC

- reply

Not my call

2026-02-16 06:56:00 UTC

BIP-110 fixes taproot.
Until now it has making Bitcoin less efficient at being money due to the OP_IF nonsense.
We have been consuming the same resources and facilitating *less* monetary activity as a result of taproot.
The alternative ways of stashing data it provides will be largely parried by the second order consequences of successful activation of BIP-110.
Vid 👇
https://youtu.be/JPE7X_q3A7A

2026-02-14 22:26:05 UTC

https://youtu.be/T65RXneAkCA

2026-02-11 05:17:17 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEtVfQNTs2I

2026-01-20 02:37:20 UTC

The correct number of files to have on your desktop is zero.

2026-01-17 22:28:01 UTC

- reply

Thanks! That'll be the first one I try

2026-01-17 21:25:36 UTC

- reply

Thanks for the thoughts!
I downgraded to a "volt" as that is standards compliant (and just USB) so I have functioning audio on the machine right away.
Last time I used a DAW in Linux-land was Ardour about 11 years ago.
I never even liked protools (which is what Ardour is the FOSS equivalent of) so unsurprisingly I didn't get far with it.
I agree that great music makers don't need a billion fancy things to make good music. I'm happy going barebones with it.
BitWig comes highly recommended but it's not free and that undermines the overall effort of ditching MacOS in the first place.
I'll probably try Ardour again or Audacity.
Something to make simple video edits too would be great. Main thing is reliability and no weird linux stuff like random cutting out when you render files.

2026-01-17 21:20:26 UTC

- reply

It's working surprisingly well