I guess you want to argue semantics.
An advanced civilization is one that is characterized by highly developed technology, advanced knowledge systems, energy control and complex organization.
And in all of your comments you assume that the current civilization is the most advanced.
Again, you assume to know how conditions have varied over time.
Archeology, like most other sciences, is completely captured, but feel free to defer to the Vatican, the Smithsonian, UNESCO, etc.
I'm sure if they've discovered something that contradicts the mainstream narrative, they would've instantly come clean and rewritten history.
You can't get reliable information on current events, but you somehow believe to be getting reliable information on events that might've happened or might not have happened hundreds/thousands of years ago, and even from an alleged architect from the 1st century BC (Vitruvius), who may or may not have existed.
Not sure if I'm chatting with ChatGPT or just someone who recites the official narrative.
