Jackk on Nostr: All timechains of Bitcoin are in superposition. Schrödinger’s Bitcoin, it’s both ...
All timechains of Bitcoin are in superposition. Schrödinger’s Bitcoin, it’s both dead and alive.
Not in the double spend sense; but in the mempool as unmined sense. Nobody knows the outcome yet still. True irreducibility of conscious work.
For some, the block has been seemingly mined, for others it has not. Consensus fractured. Entropy rises. The blocks are becoming more and more unstable to build upon as energy disperses in low density work:memory. Joules per MB^2 or sats per MB^2 the relationship is obvious.
Larger blocks preserve more memory for the same PoW. Low density and low efficiency work preserved as bits in time.
What is a mind to the node and the conserved energy of the network. What does it mean to our conserved time when we fork the bits? A fracture in mindshare is a fracture in energy between the chains, thus a fracture in value. Same total energy diluted across 2 chains of memory. Beware of fiat debt and risk. It’s just the logic of conservation of energy 😵💫
What’s preserved as memory in Bitcoin will persist. Bitcoin will be fine. We must lower our time preference quite literally. Choose wisely what we are going build our blocks on. It’s going to get messy 🫡
Debt backed Bitcoin will be forced to respond to changing economic conditions. This is a double spend disaster brewing between physical goods and 2 fractured ledger states of memory, all pegged to the fiat ledger for price. Fiat price is not the truth in Bitcoin. A reorg is major risk. Be careful everyone 🧡
Published at
2026-08-09 04:28:49 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "2b70c1e2886db7f0f51bea9086aff27417e10a3c4026830d4a6e36f584636a99",
"pubkey": "3c4f51561243524f307ed2ee272c7cf4a782404fbe3a176606043b6ad427ee77",
"created_at": 1786249729,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"client",
"Primal iOS"
]
],
"content": "All timechains of Bitcoin are in superposition. Schrödinger’s Bitcoin, it’s both dead and alive.\n\nNot in the double spend sense; but in the mempool as unmined sense. Nobody knows the outcome yet still. True irreducibility of conscious work. \n\nFor some, the block has been seemingly mined, for others it has not. Consensus fractured. Entropy rises. The blocks are becoming more and more unstable to build upon as energy disperses in low density work:memory. Joules per MB^2 or sats per MB^2 the relationship is obvious. \n\nLarger blocks preserve more memory for the same PoW. Low density and low efficiency work preserved as bits in time.\n\nWhat is a mind to the node and the conserved energy of the network. What does it mean to our conserved time when we fork the bits? A fracture in mindshare is a fracture in energy between the chains, thus a fracture in value. Same total energy diluted across 2 chains of memory. Beware of fiat debt and risk. It’s just the logic of conservation of energy 😵💫 \n\nWhat’s preserved as memory in Bitcoin will persist. Bitcoin will be fine. We must lower our time preference quite literally. Choose wisely what we are going build our blocks on. It’s going to get messy 🫡\n\nDebt backed Bitcoin will be forced to respond to changing economic conditions. This is a double spend disaster brewing between physical goods and 2 fractured ledger states of memory, all pegged to the fiat ledger for price. Fiat price is not the truth in Bitcoin. A reorg is major risk. Be careful everyone 🧡",
"sig": "13aeb5339cbeb77ac17276cffb074b33c026c2750b0a4404bb8e12369aa0b4cb5dc7a7c00262172a5ba6deb1b3041ad3e766e1cabed877aa0557da8f4781cb96"
}