nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqufmlneg8tt9jwvk6p40t02lxhmkns6zlpu4cwrvxerczdnn4syzq4pd73q (nprofile…d73q) Phantasm (nprofile…s2sp) I think every published work that could practically be modified by someone to do something useful should be under a free license.
Although, it's fair enough that the license requires that a reasonable notice that it has been modified and where to get the original one from.
I don't care if someones opinion how they like to blow their nose with napkins is under a proprietary license, because what use is that to anyone else?
Even in the case of a recording of a speech about something, where changing the spoken words in the recording would be arguably be rewriting history, using CC BY-NC 4.0 as the license, means that you've also forbidden copyright permission to add a backing GNU/Beat track.
