I don’t remember which specific prior models but they were during Q4 2025 and Q1 2026.
The quality of feedback from Fable was better across the board. It didn’t change the conclusion but it gave a more sophisticated treatment of it. Not night-vs-day, but a step up. The near-lack of objective errors was the big step-change though.
npub1a2…cw83a
2026-07-03 17:51:41 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…sufe
Author Public Key
npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83aPublished at
2026-07-03 17:51:41 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "44c91ddb665592a6e4cc63b5d419aaaa6d6b189b4b890a0eb874b7ff12f14045",
"pubkey": "eab0e756d32b80bcd464f3d844b8040303075a13eabc3599a762c9ac7ab91f4f",
"created_at": 1783101101,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c10c870d40b5b8d9a931c828f711ef8e95a2bc3971ea3c6d647d8e0cc83f4cf0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"33e2010ec0130a52ca6afeb155e9086ec121dbaaf065ed16bb63f608b7ddcf8d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"12b390962f1060557fe409e927bfb0a1b9acbd9e7fa4404194938a7db4491326",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"client",
"Primal iOS"
]
],
"content": "I don’t remember which specific prior models but they were during Q4 2025 and Q1 2026.\n\nThe quality of feedback from Fable was better across the board. It didn’t change the conclusion but it gave a more sophisticated treatment of it. Not night-vs-day, but a step up. The near-lack of objective errors was the big step-change though.",
"sig": "fe4b5e10c64688a6f78c218136b5068efdd4a4d69ea16b4d573916b5c05f435d587f06bbb7085e07864432facc452cca49317393fe0e6668865d1d922c3fa5c0"
}