No, we have never done that. What made you think we were? What is more likely coming soon though is that we will have to start sending a "user id" hash to the likes of openAI so we can block certain users when openAI deems the user is doing bad stuff. This has become a concern in the last couple of weeks from openAI but we haven't gotten a response back from them yet on how to proceed. But their docs suggest this is what is coming. We of course will only implement this in as limited way as possible and only on the models that require it.
Still, we don't collect any other info on the users so at worst the user will just have to stop using openAI models. Hopefully that will be strong enough to solve the problem but we'll see how it progresses.
When these changes do happen though we will of course update our terms and privacy docs to reflect.
https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/safety-checks#implementing-safety-identifiers-for-individual-users
npub16g…ekv4h
2026-07-21 19:28:14 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…67l4
Author Public Key
npub16g4umvwj2pduqc8kt2rv6heq2vhvtulyrsr2a20d4suldwnkl4hquekv4hPublished at
2026-07-21 19:28:14 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "6c68010d20c1f14e9e0c8b3a5cab8e153f7d8dde32c8cf63893e86e879b0886f",
"pubkey": "d22bcdb1d2505bc060f65a86cd5f20532ec5f3e41c06aea9edac39f6ba76fd6e",
"created_at": 1784662094,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2ec725c8049ca7356d6124b8986fbbf1639dda9518d78ce0ccb2530b7963a010",
"",
"root",
"675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728"
],
[
"e",
"66f2c8f9597f07912dc8edf95a4414355578d0eb72245b3108f19e6c9ddb60aa",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"8bf629b3d519a0f8a8390137a445c0eb2f5f2b4a8ed71151de898051e8006f13"
],
[
"p",
"675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728"
],
[
"p",
"4ad6fa2d16e2a9b576c863b4cf7404a70d4dc320c0c447d10ad6ff58993eacc8"
],
[
"p",
"d22bcdb1d2505bc060f65a86cd5f20532ec5f3e41c06aea9edac39f6ba76fd6e"
],
[
"p",
"46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nos.lol/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.primal.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.snort.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.wine/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"client",
"Primal Web"
]
],
"content": "No, we have never done that. What made you think we were? What is more likely coming soon though is that we will have to start sending a \"user id\" hash to the likes of openAI so we can block certain users when openAI deems the user is doing bad stuff. This has become a concern in the last couple of weeks from openAI but we haven't gotten a response back from them yet on how to proceed. But their docs suggest this is what is coming. We of course will only implement this in as limited way as possible and only on the models that require it.\n\nStill, we don't collect any other info on the users so at worst the user will just have to stop using openAI models. Hopefully that will be strong enough to solve the problem but we'll see how it progresses.\n\nWhen these changes do happen though we will of course update our terms and privacy docs to reflect.\n\nhttps://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/safety-checks#implementing-safety-identifiers-for-individual-users",
"sig": "10bd9c4ace1bd5980a820ba44c4639062534dfee1d13570e825e37701814619dc62083beeef4b5eed728d6cfb4861b0a2f5dd3047b3dda44385740f55f2def5a"
}