Aaron van Wirdum on Nostr: As I’ve said before… Those that wish to block OP_RETURNs and whatever else they ...
As I’ve said before…
Those that wish to block OP_RETURNs and whatever else they see as spam should deploy a UASF to render it invalid.
Those that consider this a form of (or path to) censorship and undesirable should deploy a URSF (user rejected soft fork) to counter it.
Exchanges can offer fork futures long before the actual split happens, gauging market sentiment and informing miners where to direct their hash power at fork point. (Hopefully we’ll see a winner-takes-most dynamic and minimal disruption for non-upgraded nodes, i.e. no large re-orgs.)
Published at
2025-10-12 07:10:39 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "639e539d37c3eab83c24b67e8f5afb8373ce77d4d3969f50ac64d6943f2c0667",
"pubkey": "e8d67c435a4a59304e1414280e952efe17be4254fca27916bf63f9f73e54aba4",
"created_at": 1760253039,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"imeta",
"url https://image.nostr.build/1540e77856292ea701ddc0b4f363d4c1de3090a0871945253654475940a9dcea.jpg",
"blurhash e9R{#@00s:-pxt-;M{IUn$xaxuD*M{xtjZ_3IUt7oKaxM{%Mt6oyof",
"dim 1008x376"
],
[
"r",
"https://image.nostr.build/1540e77856292ea701ddc0b4f363d4c1de3090a0871945253654475940a9dcea.jpg"
]
],
"content": "As I’ve said before…\n\nThose that wish to block OP_RETURNs and whatever else they see as spam should deploy a UASF to render it invalid.\n\nThose that consider this a form of (or path to) censorship and undesirable should deploy a URSF (user rejected soft fork) to counter it.\n\nExchanges can offer fork futures long before the actual split happens, gauging market sentiment and informing miners where to direct their hash power at fork point. (Hopefully we’ll see a winner-takes-most dynamic and minimal disruption for non-upgraded nodes, i.e. no large re-orgs.)\n\nhttps://image.nostr.build/1540e77856292ea701ddc0b4f363d4c1de3090a0871945253654475940a9dcea.jpg",
"sig": "b338b85640ea126c63226f2495ca54b219225bf7d39d87f449fbed59c215e5c1ff29df8d9c0e8196732c12f86fae8f4760c6e332de2652eed9df4a08b5b99bf8"
}
