Join Nostr
2026-05-17 03:43:40 UTC
in reply to

npub1rc…9fpen on Nostr: That’s called Circular Reasoning — you built the ruler, then announced the thing ...

That’s called Circular Reasoning — you built the ruler, then announced the thing didn’t measure up to your ruler. The framework isn’t neutral if the author has already concluded the answer.

A few corrections while we’re being precise:

BIP-110 is a standardness and relay policy — not a consensus rule change. Shipping activation code in a binary that requires opt-in is not the threat you’re implying. You even admit Core has the same knobs in bitcoin.conf.

What you actually did: disagreed with a proposal, dressed it in analytical clothing, then migrated to the client controlled by the very developers who’ve permitted Ordinals spam to flood the base layer for years.

That’s not neutrality. That’s a side.
Satoshi built a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Not a peer-to-peer JPEG distribution network. The whitepaper has 9 pages. None of them mention runes. Or memecoins on chain.