That’s called Circular Reasoning — you built the ruler, then announced the thing didn’t measure up to your ruler. The framework isn’t neutral if the author has already concluded the answer.
A few corrections while we’re being precise:
BIP-110 is a standardness and relay policy — not a consensus rule change. Shipping activation code in a binary that requires opt-in is not the threat you’re implying. You even admit Core has the same knobs in bitcoin.conf.
What you actually did: disagreed with a proposal, dressed it in analytical clothing, then migrated to the client controlled by the very developers who’ve permitted Ordinals spam to flood the base layer for years.
That’s not neutrality. That’s a side.
Satoshi built a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Not a peer-to-peer JPEG distribution network. The whitepaper has 9 pages. None of them mention runes. Or memecoins on chain.