Cyph3rp9nk on Nostr: What I understand. Adam Back is not Satoshi, but he would sell himself to Epstein as ...
What I understand.
Adam Back is not Satoshi, but he would sell himself to Epstein as the founder because of his contributions to proof of work.
But it was clear that Blockstream was totally corrupt, just like Core.
I hope Adam Back comes out and explains all this.
I've been warning about this for a long time; we've been too naive.
Published at
2026-02-01 09:33:49 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "c5d149b48924a751c09bafd229c513fe4de84e10f2435314d3dbaff26edec633",
"pubkey": "fcf70a45cfa817eaa813b9ba8a375d713d3169f4a27f3dcac3d49112df67d37e",
"created_at": 1769938429,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "What I understand.\n\nAdam Back is not Satoshi, but he would sell himself to Epstein as the founder because of his contributions to proof of work.\n\nBut it was clear that Blockstream was totally corrupt, just like Core.\n\nI hope Adam Back comes out and explains all this.\n\nI've been warning about this for a long time; we've been too naive.\n\n",
"sig": "add22fd134b875ac10c74cf7fb0b844c46dd659f7852f174028099a616137cd5ff4782fb3fbbd310a6a14d1c5d5fb1aa32ba8e203ae328a225653cd4c1f8143d"
}
