npub1r5…jrvel on Nostr: I think BIP 110 activating via UASF would be a net positive for Bitcoin. The brutal ...
I think BIP 110 activating via UASF would be a net positive for Bitcoin.
The brutal humiliation of the bitfluencer intelligensia would be gorgeous.
But what I’d be most curious about is, if a few years later we’d see the fence-sitters pretend they were part of the movement.
Unfortunately, the Block Size War was just before I got into our beloved orange ponzi, so I didn’t experience it. But I’m starting to believe a significant amount of people rocking their UASF hats are imposters and never belonged to the die-hard Bitcoin retards willing to pull the grenade pin.
Curious about if it turned out like this with BIP 110.
Published at
2026-06-24 13:21:58 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "b1775ff6800cc67111a034179828bc66f54707e4fba143cfcba77fec2514ddc2",
"pubkey": "1d1951986d822f69951f54c45567fca06c1bba2e777db58bd7f97a77f2e5bc9b",
"created_at": 1782307318,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "I think BIP 110 activating via UASF would be a net positive for Bitcoin.\n\nThe brutal humiliation of the bitfluencer intelligensia would be gorgeous.\n\nBut what I’d be most curious about is, if a few years later we’d see the fence-sitters pretend they were part of the movement.\n\nUnfortunately, the Block Size War was just before I got into our beloved orange ponzi, so I didn’t experience it. But I’m starting to believe a significant amount of people rocking their UASF hats are imposters and never belonged to the die-hard Bitcoin retards willing to pull the grenade pin.\n\nCurious about if it turned out like this with BIP 110.\n\n",
"sig": "a8a32767c0e961547c45377b7319e11cf5d739b8854d516cb3143fb0e3d227355504e29703a11c5a319b9e1c6c3b2c7aaf7ad1e96acdb3dd72a32850b50f92a7"
}