I'm going to assume you accidentally left out the word "healthcare" after "trans" and "a medical necessity." I'm also going to assume that English isn't your first language because the syntax of your sentence/question isn't lining up and is confusing as hell.
While the U.S. was indeed arguing on behalf of transgender children and their guardians, the case isn't about whether trans healthcare is a freedom of choice. Which by the way, I honestly don't know what the hell you mean by that. "Is trans a complete freedom of choice?" What the fuck does that mean?
The bottom line is it shouldn't have mattered whether trans kids or trans healthcare was involved in the case or not. This is about the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the United States. Should the government be able to pass legislation that denies citizens access to healthcare based on ANY criteria?
In my opinion the answer is a resounding no. It doesn't matter if one is receiving treatment for gender dysphoria, diabetes or cancer. The court failed the American people and in my opinion this is going to open the door and set precedent for dangerous policies against all citizens of the country.
npub1yn…wt3te
2025-06-18 18:39:05 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…er2s
Author Public Key
npub1yn0hz0e4dajek9xue8t4vf9um6wrulztl2p7c2weanfg5ryk590sfwt3teSeen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2025-06-18 18:39:05 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "34d62722cc0e6076a2261f4e9c60ae7be0353987ba0a114f539cb124dd8d1e55",
"pubkey": "24df713f356f659b14dcc9d75624bcde9c3e7c4bfa83ec29d9ecd28a0c96a15f",
"created_at": 1750271945,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"08702109c83cfe04249a9285e80dbebbd6eaa05f874d400dc6ec969216064a13"
],
[
"p",
"24df713f356f659b14dcc9d75624bcde9c3e7c4bfa83ec29d9ecd28a0c96a15f"
],
[
"e",
"26c0302148c6831ee1ca62638669d33d4113313e92f10ec0a65eb9b6123662df",
"",
"reply",
"08702109c83cfe04249a9285e80dbebbd6eaa05f874d400dc6ec969216064a13"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://beige.party/@WrenArcher/114705822188769341",
"web"
],
[
"e",
"4e83ad497f86959bf14898e31956ee59fd984a59c5ac09d9d42398f7efa4bc5b",
"",
"root",
"24df713f356f659b14dcc9d75624bcde9c3e7c4bfa83ec29d9ecd28a0c96a15f"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://beige.party/users/WrenArcher/statuses/114705822188769341",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://beige.party/users/WrenArcher/statuses/114705822188769341",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "I'm going to assume you accidentally left out the word \"healthcare\" after \"trans\" and \"a medical necessity.\" I'm also going to assume that English isn't your first language because the syntax of your sentence/question isn't lining up and is confusing as hell.\n\nWhile the U.S. was indeed arguing on behalf of transgender children and their guardians, the case isn't about whether trans healthcare is a freedom of choice. Which by the way, I honestly don't know what the hell you mean by that. \"Is trans a complete freedom of choice?\" What the fuck does that mean?\n\nThe bottom line is it shouldn't have mattered whether trans kids or trans healthcare was involved in the case or not. This is about the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the United States. Should the government be able to pass legislation that denies citizens access to healthcare based on ANY criteria? \n\nIn my opinion the answer is a resounding no. It doesn't matter if one is receiving treatment for gender dysphoria, diabetes or cancer. The court failed the American people and in my opinion this is going to open the door and set precedent for dangerous policies against all citizens of the country.",
"sig": "9e79d964905ce591165bfd92130188a1d09345f49c7536b3e7c06f7607dd59dbd84489ab3f5c5d36269bf4dac79768589461260a17ee7ee33c14f5fdf01d8ce1"
}