I like nutzaps because: 1. Better verification assuming the mint is widely trusted - > reputation builds up 2. Still some degree of plausible deniability: You could say ecash doesn't equal real money, it's an IOU (not a lawyer) 3. No peel-chain type of privacy leak like with Bitcoin 4. More stable from a developer standpoint because there is no third party involved in the publishing of the zap receipt like with LN zaps 5. Funny name
LN zaps: - Less verifiable probably due to random LN nodes posting the zap receipt - Worse stability of receipt structure : it is third party publishing with whatever tags they want. You can just propose the event as a client app - Better deniability due to the above
Onchain: - Very strong verifiability - Privacy ramifications most users can't calculate beforehand - Future fees and waiting times if bitcoin succeeds
Most use a custodian LN wallet (99.9%) anyway and there's really no way to abstract away the privacy consequences of onchain so ecash is my winner. nevent1q…8l9f