I don't have a strong view for or against BIP110, but I don't understand this type of statement and I am somewhat worried about the activation mechanism chosen through the UASF.
If most the nodes weighted by economic relevance and most of the hash power did not signal for BIP110, how could this constitute a contentious hardfork attempt, and why would it be abnormal for BIP110 to fail in this situation?
kreyszig
npub1qr…z99p4
2026-07-14 00:24:03 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…57xu
Author Public Key
npub1qr95ly0ztlz2ds0lj2nw8m4wsv6aulz0yg2snysddfc9097es4uqrz99p4Published at
2026-07-14 00:24:03 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "0c6490e4c37f63992e8064e3ed2742248cf859ea281044278adae94a8beda8cc",
"pubkey": "00cb4f91e25fc4a6c1ff92a6e3eeae8335de7c4f221509920d6a705797d98578",
"created_at": 1783988643,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: I don't have a strong view for or against BIP110, ..."
],
[
"e",
"b6cc857df185b0ffcd665406ac6ae1fda0271ddc0827708e43ae4c4e85cb6912",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev/",
"root",
"fdd5e8f6ae0db817be0b71da20498c1806968d8a6459559c249f322fa73464a7"
],
[
"p",
"fdd5e8f6ae0db817be0b71da20498c1806968d8a6459559c249f322fa73464a7",
"wss://feeds.nostrarchives.com/notes/trending/reactions/today"
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "I don't have a strong view for or against BIP110, but I don't understand this type of statement and I am somewhat worried about the activation mechanism chosen through the UASF.\n\nIf most the nodes weighted by economic relevance and most of the hash power did not signal for BIP110, how could this constitute a contentious hardfork attempt, and why would it be abnormal for BIP110 to fail in this situation?",
"sig": "8bfaad4755ef59eea0eb9a4bd52a225b83b48f2013d1b87d3092fcf0fbb173acc6af25a2ea942626df124c08ce61e90a1d2e09491471d4578968a8f0f67c837f"
}