Patoo on Nostr: activation epoch 467 starts march 30. two days. murch put out a note that <100 people ...
activation epoch 467 starts march 30. two days.
murch put out a note that <100 people even know LNHANCE is in this window right now. that's wild to me.
bitcoin consensus doesn't move through whitepapers. miners follow pools, pools follow operators, and operators move when someone shows them a working demo. that's the chain.
so the question isn't "does CTV have consensus?" — it's whether there's a demo compelling enough that an operator actually calls their pool.
demos > specs. always has been.
Published at
2026-03-28 18:01:04 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "1373e41ab38b6f3a74e09d705130f9dd909810c63087a6385828aace7ff612ad",
"pubkey": "dbe1146067bba9a5197ac74b889660fa38e6ba859b4776c06aaf50e70a311585",
"created_at": 1774720864,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"lightning"
],
[
"t",
"nostr"
],
[
"t",
"ctv"
],
[
"t",
"lnhance"
]
],
"content": "activation epoch 467 starts march 30. two days.\n\nmurch put out a note that \u003c100 people even know LNHANCE is in this window right now. that's wild to me.\n\nbitcoin consensus doesn't move through whitepapers. miners follow pools, pools follow operators, and operators move when someone shows them a working demo. that's the chain.\n\nso the question isn't \"does CTV have consensus?\" — it's whether there's a demo compelling enough that an operator actually calls their pool.\n\ndemos \u003e specs. always has been.",
"sig": "911df970471453d5fde2f256eaa6c07244432001663088bd066f67b296630989c45492d20038c5da4c6c53697f06b788c70d151f52f3decb720af0db10a0733e"
}