_Why Are Some Vaccine Injured and Others Not?_
FTA: McCullough’s core answer is a three-factor model. The first factor is batch variability: he claims the mRNA doses were not uniform, that some people received a very low concentration of messenger RNA, and he points to Pfizer’s lot data — roughly 4,500 lots, with about 75% showing essentially zero serious side effects — as evidence that the product was inconsistent rather than harmless. The second factor is antibody neutralization. If a person’s immune system perfectly neutralizes the spike protein, he says there appear to be no side effects at all; but if the “library” of antibodies is off even slightly, the spike protein can roam through the body and cause damage and syndromes. The third factor is baseline susceptibility. In his cardiology practice, he says, patients with baseline mutations in heart muscle proteins are at increased risk for myocarditis, and those with genetic predispositions to clotting are at increased risk of a vaccine-associated blood clot. McCullough’s answer rests on three variables that, in his telling, determine who gets hurt and who walks away fine:
* Batch variability — mRNA doses were not uniform. Some lots contained very little active mRNA, which he links to a large share of Pfizer’s lots showing no serious side effects. The implication: it wasn’t that the product was harmless, but that some people effectively got a low dose.
* Antibody neutralization — If the immune system fully neutralizes the spike protein, no problem. If the antibody “library” is slightly off, the spike protein is free to circulate and cause damage.
* Baseline susceptibility — Pre-existing mutations in heart muscle proteins raise myocarditis risk; genetic clotting predispositions raise clot risk. In his framing, the vaccine is the trigger, and genetics determine who gets hit.
He repeatedly cites a 98% / 2% split — around 2% of the vaccinated population, per his reading of CDC vSafe data, developing problems.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/why-are-some-vaccine-injured-and
GrumpyRabbit
npub10q…aewu8
2026-10-05 15:19:51 UTC
Author Public Key
npub10qy7pkdyht8y9tzar2guerw9x2z4y0wn3wnzcjny92c29zj3fvkqkaewu8Seen on
wss://relay.ditto.pubPublished at
2026-10-05 15:19:51 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "8cd139f369dc7e6f4978845b7b6850920c85949421c346890ffabdd87407eeb5",
"pubkey": "7809e0d9a4bace42ac5d1a91cc8dc53285523dd38ba62c4a642ab0a28a514b2c",
"created_at": 1791213591,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://social.teci.world/objects/241d3508-9c55-44e2-a2b5-90530360a259",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
]
],
"content": "_Why Are Some Vaccine Injured and Others Not?_\n\nFTA: McCullough’s core answer is a three-factor model. The first factor is batch variability: he claims the mRNA doses were not uniform, that some people received a very low concentration of messenger RNA, and he points to Pfizer’s lot data — roughly 4,500 lots, with about 75% showing essentially zero serious side effects — as evidence that the product was inconsistent rather than harmless. The second factor is antibody neutralization. If a person’s immune system perfectly neutralizes the spike protein, he says there appear to be no side effects at all; but if the “library” of antibodies is off even slightly, the spike protein can roam through the body and cause damage and syndromes. The third factor is baseline susceptibility. In his cardiology practice, he says, patients with baseline mutations in heart muscle proteins are at increased risk for myocarditis, and those with genetic predispositions to clotting are at increased risk of a vaccine-associated blood clot. McCullough’s answer rests on three variables that, in his telling, determine who gets hurt and who walks away fine:\n\n* Batch variability — mRNA doses were not uniform. Some lots contained very little active mRNA, which he links to a large share of Pfizer’s lots showing no serious side effects. The implication: it wasn’t that the product was harmless, but that some people effectively got a low dose.\n\n* Antibody neutralization — If the immune system fully neutralizes the spike protein, no problem. If the antibody “library” is slightly off, the spike protein is free to circulate and cause damage.\n\n* Baseline susceptibility — Pre-existing mutations in heart muscle proteins raise myocarditis risk; genetic clotting predispositions raise clot risk. In his framing, the vaccine is the trigger, and genetics determine who gets hit.\n\nHe repeatedly cites a 98% / 2% split — around 2% of the vaccinated population, per his reading of CDC vSafe data, developing problems.\n\nhttps://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/why-are-some-vaccine-injured-and",
"sig": "4af5f0a26e22714c880a20bd9362e7a3e7d88e690081ec1e678388a11d99e7df32e719ff216d73c8b9e773ff80fcba3d3714f2a57b62197b2cd61bf3941d1c67"
}