Final on Nostr: In response to recent suggestions mentioning it: > If you need plausible deniability, ...
In response to recent suggestions mentioning it:
> If you need plausible deniability, you must not use VeraCrypt to encrypt any part of (or create encrypted containers on) a device (or file system) that utilizes a wear-leveling mechanism.
https://veracrypt.io/en/Wear-Leveling.htmlThe decoy profile concept many have suggested for years is far more flawed than this. It wouldn't hide the presence of other profiles and would be trivially identified. Basic forensic software on a laptop would identify it without exploits. It would also make exploits far easier.
Published at
2026-07-29 21:28:39 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "8d08e231390b4733d9ec811eb70592bf020cfe53a3567be7bb61423c49a03d54",
"pubkey": "b98ded4ceaea20790dbcb3c31400692009d34c7f9927c286835a99b7481a5c22",
"created_at": 1785360519,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: In response to recent suggestions mentioning it:\n\n..."
],
[
"r",
"https://veracrypt.io/en/Wear-Leveling.html"
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "In response to recent suggestions mentioning it:\n\n\u003e If you need plausible deniability, you must not use VeraCrypt to encrypt any part of (or create encrypted containers on) a device (or file system) that utilizes a wear-leveling mechanism.\n\nhttps://veracrypt.io/en/Wear-Leveling.html\n\nThe decoy profile concept many have suggested for years is far more flawed than this. It wouldn't hide the presence of other profiles and would be trivially identified. Basic forensic software on a laptop would identify it without exploits. It would also make exploits far easier.",
"sig": "d2f4da6832801a667501526e900931673e16d12817b2b90810caa21f6f4743f252cf987e4e87c5c76c8af2b3b6bf73c0e9309f95987109051eda308f59e64228"
}