1.) Search my twitter posts for any mention of any part of that discussion. "Neutral", at least publicly, would be a fair characterization.
2.) "Which means you definitely should not trust a software process..." I agree. Which is why the code is fully FOSS so that anyone can extensively VERIFY every aspect of it. There is no "Trust me, bro" in the SeedSigner stack.
If you're not interested in verifying the code (or pointing an AI at it), that's your choice and obv no one is forcing you to use a SeedSigner in the first place.
Opt in or don't. Verify or don't. Any perceived barriers or risks are strictly around what you are willing or not willing to do.
I don't mean that as some kind of insult or burn.
I'm just saying there's no part of this process that relies on the user taking me at my word.
You invoke the word "trust" as if I'm expecting that of the reader.
That's your misunderstanding you're strawmanning out to the world.
