npub180…jh6w6 on Nostr: Now about your opinions I think they are wrong, but that's a long topic. I don't ...

Now about your opinions I think they are wrong, but that's a long topic. I don't understand what you're asking me, but you seen to have realized in the middle of your message that there are is no way to do what you are trying to do in a decentralized way. Luckily for me I don't think humanity needs a centralized AI-powered global "discovery" layer, so I don't have to try to build that.

If you read the thread at

quoting nevent1q…0lyr

Yes, although I think they're abandoning that nomenclature because it makes no sense. The AppView layer doesn't need standardization or interoperability, it can do anything it wants, so it doesn't make sense for it to be described in the protocol.

I've seen they calling it just "app". But, while in Nostr an "app" is a client-side software that runs on your computer, there it is a "platform", an old-style "web2.0" service, like Twitter, that has a backend part and a frontend part.

Bluesky took to their heart jack (npub1sg6…f63m)'s idea that eventually Twitter would be an app on their protocol, so they designed it in such a way that 90% of the actual Twitter codebase could be reused and the Twitter frontend could be basically unchanged.

maybe you'll realize that your goals and aspirations are much better served by the AT Protocol than by Nostr.

I'm curious about why you prefer Nostr over ATProto, if you ever thought about that.