Jackk on Nostr: Just as there are economists who won’t engage with the economics of Bitcoin ...

Just as there are economists who won’t engage with the economics of Bitcoin honestly, there are physicists who won’t engage with the physics of Bitcoin honestly.

Within the ranks of Bitcoin, a persons actions will show if their first principles are actually grounded to Bitcoin or not. Why is Bitcoin not physics? What is Bitcoin objectively measuring at the quantum level? This question must be answered; asked directly to the physicists, all of them.

There must logically be an objective measure here; there’s no way a single person could currently process the knowledge to understand all of it. There is real unmined physical knowledge here, I’m just telling people to help look. We haven’t a clue what Bitcoin truly is. I can only rationalize Quantum Computer literally.