Join Nostr
2025-09-09 13:32:02 UTC
in reply to

ko yaa nis fiatsi on Nostr: Maybe mleku, but the games in question are *legal* and a payment processor's job is ...

Maybe , but the games in question are *legal* and a payment processor's job is to facilitate payment for legal trade, not get involved in moral or behaviour changing activities. I'm not a fan of that genre and it sounds like you aren't as well, but it's not much of a stretch to see how this mechanism if allowed for legitimate activity can be extended into other *legally allowed* fields. The Slippery Slope Fallacy will be less fallacy if the processors are allowed to behave in this manner imho 👍

Furthermore, I'd bet that Epstein had services facilitated by them, where's the 'reputational risk' argument by them here?