Join Nostr
2026-09-19 13:13:35 UTC

npub1m6…ue2p9 on Nostr: The same house can sell for far more in New York City than in an Oklahoma cul-de-sac. ...

The same house can sell for far more in New York City than in an Oklahoma cul-de-sac. It didn't change. The buyer's context did.

That simple example breaks the idea that value lives inside an asset. When people say an asset has "intrinsic value," they usually mean it has utility they recognize. Real estate provides shelter, gold has industrial uses, and a business can produce cash flow. None of those uses creates one objective value for every person in every place.

A discounted cash flow analysis doesn't uncover a permanent value hidden inside a stock. It estimates future cash flows under a set of assumptions. Change them, and the answer changes. The market can disagree anyway.

Every financial asset is a bet on future demand. Bitcoin is no exception. Its utility comes from an absolutely fixed supply, the ability to transfer value globally, and sovereign control through private keys without counterparty risk.

The useful question isn't whether bitcoin has intrinsic value. It's whether its utility fits the job you need an asset to do. Separate utility from market price, and you can compare bitcoin with stocks, gold, and real estate by the role each plays in your FIRE plan—not a label none can satisfy.

Read the full argument: https://firebtc.io/p/the-intrinsic-value-myth