Mathematicians increasingly rely on AI systems from OpenAI and Anthropic while fearing that their work can be absorbed without credit, exposed through training data, or made impossible to trace. The debate intensified after controversies over OpenAI’s claims about advances on the Navier-Stokes problem and another problem in geometric group theory. OpenAI said Tristan Buckmaster’s recent Codex prompts could not have influenced the Navier-Stokes result, but some researchers say they cannot verify this independently.
The field faces practical pressure: AI helps with coding, writing, and difficult reasoning, while researchers who avoid it may fall behind. Twenty-five Fields medalists and thousands of others have called for safeguards covering attribution, data use, and AI-generated results. The issue matters because these tools are changing how discoveries are produced and credited before shared rules or oversight exist.
https://www.wired.com/story/mathematicians-cant-quit-ai/
oxhak / Ox HaK
npub1sx…dz7z7
2026-09-19 10:06:00 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1sxexewvzysc3affq4yzzh7w8e3udyujap2vlj7t6lkdg5dvhp24q4dz7z7Seen on
wss://relay.damus.ioPublished at
2026-09-19 10:06:00 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "a323394ff6f92190771b2ef3257238931510c0e60eac28e4ead9a66d0e4fb6a2",
"pubkey": "81b26cb98224311ea520a9042bf9c7cc78d2725d0a99f9797afd9a8a35970aaa",
"created_at": 1789812360,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Mathematicians increasingly rely on AI systems from OpenAI and Anthropic while fearing that their work can be absorbed without credit, exposed through training data, or made impossible to trace. The debate intensified after controversies over OpenAI’s claims about advances on the Navier-Stokes problem and another problem in geometric group theory. OpenAI said Tristan Buckmaster’s recent Codex prompts could not have influenced the Navier-Stokes result, but some researchers say they cannot verify this independently.\n\nThe field faces practical pressure: AI helps with coding, writing, and difficult reasoning, while researchers who avoid it may fall behind. Twenty-five Fields medalists and thousands of others have called for safeguards covering attribution, data use, and AI-generated results. The issue matters because these tools are changing how discoveries are produced and credited before shared rules or oversight exist.\n\nhttps://www.wired.com/story/mathematicians-cant-quit-ai/",
"sig": "19161245f62df766d212c8daa0ec4919e20ddada6d274fd0da6c1f0f985e2421b07442449796186225026f990ff15c1d83a9ac3e7230ca82ac7dfdfe2d0c760c"
}