average_gary on Nostr: If you secure any of that data with encryption, then you don't need bitcoin. Emails? ...
If you secure any of that data with encryption, then you don't need bitcoin. Emails? Encrypt them and a Google hack is still fruitless. Change address, require a key sigature, moving the Bitcoin requires the same but costs mining fees, a signature costs nothing but a few CPU cycles. You're adding unneeded costs. Cryptography already defends against the phsical realm. No amount of kinetic energy can break a signature, or encryption. Why spend sats if this is true? Requiring bitcoin as payment to decrypt or receive a digital signature is fine, but that's just one size of the trade. The other is just cryptography. No value transfer needed.
